<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - pdfseparate+pdftoppm renders different than original file" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87637#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - pdfseparate+pdftoppm renders different than original file" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87637">bug 87637</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de" title="Thomas Freitag <Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de>"> Thomas Freitag</a> <pre>(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=87637#c8">comment #8</a>) > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=113803" name="attach_113803" title="File that renders different separated than in original">attachment 113803</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=113803&action=edit" title="File that renders different separated than in original">[details]</a> > File that renders different separated than in original Funny use of a /P entry in an annotation dictionary. The spec says: (Optional except as noted below; PDF 1.3; not used in FDF files) An indirect reference to the page object with which this annotation is associated. But here the /P doesn't point to a page object (or at least not to a dictionary of type page), it points to a dictionary without any type and just some information which normally are use in a page dictionary. I used the /P entry to decide if I can remove that annotation because it references to a page which will not be separated. Seems as if I need to refine that test a little bit :-)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>