<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - pdfseparate + pdfunite produce different pdftoppm renderings" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81724#c23">Comment # 23</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - pdfseparate + pdfunite produce different pdftoppm renderings" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81724">bug 81724</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de" title="Thomas Freitag <Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de>"> Thomas Freitag</a> <pre>(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81724#c22">comment #22</a>) > I get a regression on the rendering of page 134 of > <a href="http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26748206/2001_these_mezouar.pdf">http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26748206/2001_these_mezouar.pdf</a> when using > "Don't change OC-references in image and xobject dictionaries with pdfunite" > when doing pdfseparate + pdfunite > > Can you confirm? Yes, I can confirm :-D The patch of <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81724#c21">comment 21</a> just looks for dict keys "OC" and treats it as optional content. But the PDF of <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81724#c22">comment 22</a> uses on page 134 a font named "OC" ;-) So in case of a key "OC" we have to look if it is really an optional content, which means that it points to an optional content group or an optional content membership dictionary.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>