<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - support for digital signatures"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16770#c80">Comment # 80</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - support for digital signatures"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16770">bug 16770</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ajohnson@redneon.com" title="Adrian Johnson <ajohnson@redneon.com>"> <span class="fn">Adrian Johnson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=16770#c70">comment #70</a>)
<span class="quote">> For the pdfsigverify it seems we kind of agreeed on the compromise to call
> it pdfsig that only does verification right now but in the future may
> suppport signing?</span >
This is the only thing left that I think needs fixing before the initial
release. A couple of questions:
- Given that we want to keep the option open for using pdfsig to perform other
signature operations, should the default behavior when only a pdf file is
specified be to verify the signature? Or should we just indicate whether the
pdf is signed and use an option to enable verification?
- Is '-c' the best option name for "don't perform certificate validation"?
We also need a man page.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>