<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Some math symbols are rendered incorrectly"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93168#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Some math symbols are rendered incorrectly"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93168">bug 93168</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jason@aquaticape.us" title="Jason Crain <jason@aquaticape.us>"> <span class="fn">Jason Crain</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93168#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> SymbolMT is a different font, I'm really not very happy of adding things
> here, this is something people should configure in their fontconfigs, no?</span >
I don't think it's a different font, because
* The rendering in Adobe Reader, mupdf, and Sumatra are exactly the same for
Symbol vs. SymbolMT, despite me not having any font called SymbolMT installed.
* There are already MT aliases for a few other fonts in the base14FontMap
array.
* There's also some code in SysFontList::find which removes a trailing MT
from the font name for looking up cached font info.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>