[poppler] poppler/glib: poppler-action.cc, 1.4, 1.5 poppler-action.h, 1.3, 1.4 poppler-document.cc, 1.28, 1.29 poppler-document.h, 1.16, 1.17 poppler-page.cc, 1.40, 1.41 test-poppler-glib.c, 1.14, 1.15 poppler.cc, 1.3, 1.4

[Brad Hards]

On Saturday 31 December 2005 13:10 pm, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> Update of /cvs/poppler/poppler/glib
> In directory gabe:/tmp/cvs-serv19405/glib
>
> Modified Files:
>         poppler-action.cc poppler-action.h poppler-document.cc
>         poppler-document.h poppler-page.cc test-poppler-glib.c
>         poppler.cc
> Log Message:
> Fri Dec 30 21:08:33 2005  Jonathan Blandford  <jrb at redhat.com>
>
>         * glib/*{cc,h}: Update inline doc comments.  This is in
>         preparation for gtk-doc support.
Is gtk-doc a hard requirement for the glib bindings? Could we standardise on 
doxygen?
The reason for asking is that if/when we end up sharing some common headers, 
I'd prefer them to work for both of us, including the documentation.

I am not very familiar with gtk-doc markup, however it does look very similar 
to doxygen, so there isn't likely to be much work to convert over.

Brad

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/attachments/20051231/3a6f6ecb/attachment.pgp