<div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: leena chourey <<a href="mailto:leenagour@gmail.com">leenagour@gmail.com</a>> Date: Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:49 PM Subject: Re: [poppler] Accessibility of PDF documents (corrected patch attached) To: Albert Astals Cid <<a href="mailto:aacid@kde.org">aacid@kde.org</a>> Cc: <a href="mailto:poppler@lists.freedesktop.org">poppler@lists.freedesktop.org</a>, onkar <<a href="mailto:onkarpotdar@gmail.com">onkarpotdar@gmail.com</a>>, Aparna Ramamurthy <<a href="mailto:aparna.ramamurthy@gmail.com">aparna.ramamurthy@gmail.com</a>> Dear Albert, Thanks for your response. As discussed in the last mail, we have modified the patch so that: <ul><li>There is no behavioural change in pdftohtml -c <filename> means it produces exactly the same output it did before. </li> <li>Defined new option as pdftohtml -s <filename> to generate a single html file corresponding to a pdf file.</li></ul>Please check and give your feedback if any further change is required. With best regard Leena C<div><div></div><div class="h5"> <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Albert Astals Cid <<a href="mailto:aacid@kde.org" target="_blank">aacid@kde.org</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> A Dimarts, 22 de juny de 2010, leena chourey va escriure: <div>> Dear Albert, > > Thanks for giving detail comment to patch. > Please check updates given inline: </div>Please do not forget to CC the poppler mailing list. <div><div></div><div> > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Albert Astals Cid <<a href="mailto:aacid@kde.org" target="_blank">aacid@kde.org</a>> wrote: > > A Dimecres, 16 de juny de 2010, omkar va escriure: > > > Dear Albert, > > > > > > Please find the corrected patch for "accessibility of pdf document " > > > and give your feedback. > > > > Hi, some comments: > > * The comments like > > // One more parameter(int j) is added in the getCSStyle function by CDAC > > > > developer Team > > > > need to be removed, if each line had near it who coded it, the code > > will > > > > be > > twice as big and much more unreadable > > Done, deleted all unwanted comments > > > * The spacing of your patches could be better, that is > > > > GooString* HtmlFontAccu::getCSStyle(int i, GooString* content ,int j){ > > should be > > +GooString* HtmlFontAccu::getCSStyle(int i, GooString* content, int j){ > > but that's nothing huge, i can fix it > > Updated accordingly. > > > * You are leaking (i.e. not deleting) jStr in both > > > > HtmlFontAccu::getCSStyle > > and HtmlFontAccu::CSStyle > > Deleted jStr > > > * I see that the new HtmlPage::complexHtml and the old > > > > HtmlPage::dumpComplex > > are very simple, i if you reused the code instead of copying it > > > > * This introduces a behavioural change that is unaccetable, i understand > > > > you > > want pdftohtml to produce a different (in your opinion better) output, > > for that you'll have to introduce a new comandline option to pdftohtml > > (something > > like --singlehtml) or something like that > > For last 2 point we want some clarification. > As you said behavioural change is unacceptable and also suggested to > introduce a new command line option to generate single html. So if we do as > following, will it be acceptable? > > - *Existing is:* > Command line option: pdftohtml -c <filename> > Function called: > > > dumpComplex > () > { > Read from input file > Write into file to Generates pagewise html format > } > > > - *Proposed changes:* > New Command line option : pdftohtml -s <filename> //Checked, > nothing is already defined for -s (pdftohtml -c <filename> > will exists as it is) > > > - Function called: > > dumpSingle() //new function similar to > dumpComplex { > Read from input file > Write into file to append single html format > } > > - A function to “Read from input file” can be defined and call it in > both dumpComplex() and dumpSingle(), So that code duplication can be > removed (for second last point of your mail). > - And with -s option (for --single Html) behavioural change will be > defined separately. (-c will not be affected) </div></div>To be clear, pdftohtml -c should produce exactly the same output it did before your patch, pdftohtml -s you can output your version. So yes, i think i kind of agree with your proposal. Albert <div><div></div><div> > > > For your opinion > > With Regards > Leena C & Onkar P > (for CDAC Accessibility Team) </div></div></blockquote></div> </div></div>-- Leena C </div> -- Leena C