<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/05/2012 07:37 PM, Ihar `Philips`
Filipau wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD08gx+2tqk2uR3f4yC-D7-h49FTFu-XdYBtS4Z4qrOz-eZ-wA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I haven't done it for a long time, but it should be possible to
actually install poppler from Git in a such fashion that Debian would
recognize it as a poppler package and consequently resolve all
dependencies properly. IIRC it revolves around the dh_make (or
dpkg-buildpackage (for which dsc/diff you can get from the official
Debian package)). Ask around on Debian forums/google/etc, lots of
people do it all the time.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<big><big>Thanks a lot, surely this is also a way that will
streamline the packages management with both the shipped and
self-made ones ;-) </big></big><br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD08gx+2tqk2uR3f4yC-D7-h49FTFu-XdYBtS4Z4qrOz-eZ-wA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap=""><span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>So
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>I install all of the packages/programs/tools compiled from source by me
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>in the following locations currently:
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">></span>
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>1- /usr/local for small packages/programs/tools
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">></span>
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>2- /opt for large/complex packages/programs/tools
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">></span>
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>I think I use the above method is also consistent with the /Filesystem
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>Hierarchy Standard/ <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.pathname.com/fhs/"><http://www.pathname.com/fhs/></a>.
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">></span>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">For my personal stuff - which shouldn't get into the way of the system
- I actually prefer $HOME/usr. Pro: I do not need root to install.
Contra: some software still insists on headers under /usr/include;
LD_LIBRARY_PATH/etc must include the $HOME/usr/lib.
</pre>
</blockquote>
I don't want to use $HOME for this purpose, is based on that other
considerations: such as as a user, I'll perform most operations
within my home. So, it's has more dangerous to do imappropriate
operations on these stuff to put them in $HOME than in other
places.<br>
<br>
Regars<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
.: Hongyi Zhao [ hongyi.zhao AT gmail.com ] Free as in Freedom :.</pre>
</body>
</html>