<html> <head> <style></style></head> <body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Are you sure that the problem is fonts?<div>Does the smaller file look correct when you view it?<div>A number of output errors were fixed around the time of 0.18 by falling back to rasterization in more cases.</div><div>If you change -r 300 to -r 72, does the output get a lot smaller?</div><div>Your file might have an example of a PDF feature that pdftops needs to rasterize and 0.18 might have produced a non-rasterized image that is subtly incorrect.</div><div>In the current version of poppler, you could try looking at PSOutputDev::checkPageSlice to check whether your file triggers rasterization through the line</div><div> rasterize = scan->usesTransparency() || scan->usesPatternImageMask();</div><div>William<br><br><div>> From: cloos@jhcloos.com<br>> To: korobkin+pp@gmail.com<br>> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 13:27:00 -0400<br>> CC: poppler@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> Subject: Re: [poppler] Fwd: Too many fonts embedded in a document?<br>> <br>> >>>>> "AK" == Alex Korobkin <korobkin+pp@gmail.com> writes:<br>> <br>> AK> I have this nice PDF [1], which when converted to ps with the<br>> AK> command $ pdftops -level3 -r 300 ./P020110106297943134404.pdf<br>> AK> produces 20 Mb file with poppler 0.18.4, and 1.7 Gb (!) file with<br>> AK> poppler 0.22.3<br>> <br>> Using poppler master a57f93780de1, pdftocairo -ps generates a 3.73GB<br>> file and pdftops -level3 a 1.05GB file.<br>> <br>> A git bisect would be interesting.<br>> <br>> -JimC<br>> -- <br>> James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> poppler mailing list<br>> poppler@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler<br></div></div></div> </div></body> </html>