<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:arthurborsboom@gmail.com" title="Arthur Borsboom <arthurborsboom@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Arthur Borsboom</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED INVALID - xdg-open can't open magnet links in lxqt"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78354">bug 78354</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>INVALID
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED INVALID - xdg-open can't open magnet links in lxqt"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78354#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED INVALID - xdg-open can't open magnet links in lxqt"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78354">bug 78354</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:arthurborsboom@gmail.com" title="Arthur Borsboom <arthurborsboom@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Arthur Borsboom</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>"xdg-mime query default x-scheme-handler/magnet" returns:
transmission-qt.desktop
But I am already doubting, because of something else.
When I run 'which xdg-open' it returns:
/usr/lib64/lxqt-xdg-tools/xdg-open
The version at /usr/bin/xdg-open in fact works! Both are version 1.1.0 rc1
When I type "/usr/bin/xdg-open magnet:ajksfksadfhksdajlkfads" it starts the
correct application as configured.
When I type "xdg-open magnet:adjkadsfjllkasfdads" it does not work.
I guess this is an issue generated by lxqt.
So, I believe I am knocking at the wrong door. :)
I am going to search for the right door.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>