<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - xdg-screensaver should control X11's screensaver in xfce as fallback" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80089#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - xdg-screensaver should control X11's screensaver in xfce as fallback" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80089">bug 80089</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:simon@xfce.org" title="Simon Steinbeiss <simon@xfce.org>"> Simon Steinbeiss</a> <pre>Right, I guess you can also re-do the patch to *always* control the X11 screensaver if all above options fail. Why I submitted a patch as is isn't because of a distro-specific problem, but because Xfce doesn't have its own screensaver implementation (and it's not planned), so controlling the X11 screensaver is always a good idea (in all distros) there (if xscreensaver and gnome-screensaver aren't detected). I can't say that I know what's the status of LXDE (to name an example) - while I don't think they have their own solution currently, I guess their move to LXQt will change that again.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>