[Portland] PortlandVFSProposal

Martin Konold martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Sat Jan 7 21:17:44 EET 2006


Am Samstag, 7. Januar 2006 10:21 schrieb nf2:

Hi,

> If the
> layering would have been done correctly there wouldn't be a necessity
> for project portland, RuDI,...

Portland and RuDI have a much larger scope than only file i/o. 

In general I believe that standardizing on interfaces or better protocolls is 
much better with regards to future innovation compared to standardizing on 
implementation.

BTW: Is your proposal synchronous or asynchronous?

Regards,
-- martin

-- 
http://www.erfrakon.com/
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker



More information about the Portland mailing list