<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED --- - High latency in HTTP streaming"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65703#c56">Comment # 56</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED --- - High latency in HTTP streaming"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65703">bug 65703</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tanuk@iki.fi" title="Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk@iki.fi>"> <span class="fn">Tanu Kaskinen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I very much doubt that adding a rewind callback is the correct fix. The reason
is that nothing in the code base currently implements the source output
process_rewind() callback, so it doesn't seem to be important (I don't fully
understand how source rewinding works - it's quite different from sink
rewinding).
Also, source outputs can be rewound only when connected to a monitor source.
Are you using a monitor source for testing? If not, then the callback is never
called. How can the patch then have any effect on the latency? It seems that
pa_source_output_push() behaves differently if the process_rewind() callback is
set (even if it's never called):
limit = o->process_rewind ? 0 : o->source->thread_info.max_rewind;</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>