<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - raop module does not work with shairport" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42804#c42">Comment # 42</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - raop module does not work with shairport" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42804">bug 42804</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:crisp.fujita@nifty.com" title="Hajime Fujita <crisp.fujita@nifty.com>"> Hajime Fujita</a> <pre>Hi Karl, > PULSE_SERVER=192.168.0.4:4713 firefox & I've tested that workaround but didn't get a good result either. It seems that Flash does not understand the correct sampling rate. This guess is based on the following facts: * When I play sound from Flash, apparently its tempo gets slower than the original. * By looking at the packet dump, there are sometimes sequences of packets whose audio payload is all zero (0x00). Probably this "silence" frames cause sound jumps and result in sound glitch. * When I look at the net, many people are complaining about the sample rate issue in Flash For example, I found several discussions in Chrome+Flash. * <a href="http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=229918">http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=229918</a> * <a href="https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=32757#c64">https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=32757#c64</a> However, the workaround there (setting default-sample-rate to 48000) did not work.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>