<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Please make pavucontrol have a default device option like gnome-volume-control" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75643#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Please make pavucontrol have a default device option like gnome-volume-control" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75643">bug 75643</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:nw9165-3201@yahoo.com" title="nw9165-3201@yahoo.com">nw9165-3201@yahoo.com</a> <pre>First of all, thanks for your replies. (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=75643#c1">comment #1</a>) > you should choose other flavour Why? You quoted the goals of Lubuntu prior to saying that. Could you please explain in which way the goals of Lubuntu contradict with using PulseAudio? (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=75643#c2">comment #2</a>) > I don't think we should implement the same model in > pavucontrol as in gnome-volume-control, or at least it should be optional. I have nothing againt this being optional. I actually would prefer it being optional. I didn't ask to remove anything from pavucontrol. I just would like to have pavucontrol have a similar default device option as in gnome-volume-control. Also, the DefaultDevice Wiki page mentioned earlier says that gnome-volume-control would be the "state-of-the-art method". Maybe it's just me, but I personally think it's kinda wrong to have to use GNOME to be able to use a PulseAudio setting in a state-of-the-art way. IMHO, pavucontrol should offer the state-of-the-art method.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>