<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - module-loopback ignores latency_msec option"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80770#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - module-loopback ignores latency_msec option"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80770">bug 80770</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tanuk@iki.fi" title="Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk@iki.fi>"> <span class="fn">Tanu Kaskinen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>module-loopback doesn't ignore the option, there's a different explanation for
the observations. If changing the default fragment size has some effect, then
it means that the sink (and probably source too if they're the same card) are
not using timer-based scheduling, and hence don't support dynamic latency.
Without dynamic latency, module-loopback can't control the overall latency. Or
more specifically, it can't make the latency smaller than what the sink and
source allow; it can be considered a bug that latency_msec=2000 doesn't make
the latency higher, because that should be possible to do.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>