<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Connection failure: Protocol error"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92141#c16">Comment # 16</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Connection failure: Protocol error"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92141">bug 92141</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:david.henningsson@canonical.com" title="David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>"> <span class="fn">David Henningsson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>This finding gives more questions than answers...
* When running PA 6.0, are the shm files still there?
* Why doesn't pa_shm_attach log when it can't open an shm file due to ENOENT
or EACCESS?
* If you disable srbchannel, does it start to work? (Well, yes, pactl does,
because it does not need to send audio memblocks, but programs that actually
play back audio?)
And most importantly...
* Who murdered the seemingly innocent shm files, leaving no traces?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>