<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Changing device profile to HDMI is reset to default after short delay" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93946#c23">Comment # 23</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Changing device profile to HDMI is reset to default after short delay" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93946">bug 93946</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:david.henningsson@canonical.com" title="David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>"> David Henningsson</a> <pre>(In reply to Tanu Kaskinen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93946#c21">comment #21</a>) > (In reply to David Henningsson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93946#c20">comment #20</a>) > > I can't promise when I have time and energy to continue writing > > module-port-manager. I also believe what you're suggesting is far from > > trivial (including that out of experience, routing algorithm changes are > > very likely to break some other use case), so I rather spend my efforts on > > module-port-manager than writing something to change this particular > > scenario. > > Ok, that's fine. I'll try to implement my proposal in time for 9.0. If that > fails, we should revert the change that caused this regression. I disagree that this is a regression - the phantom internal speaker is a bug caused by lower layers (ALSA/BIOS/hw). We should not revert the change when it improves routing in several other scenarios; as we would then regress those scenarios instead. Also, I'm far from confident that what you're proposing won't cause regressions in some other scenario.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>