<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Changing device profile to HDMI is reset to default after short delay" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93946#c25">Comment # 25</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Changing device profile to HDMI is reset to default after short delay" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93946">bug 93946</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:david.henningsson@canonical.com" title="David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>"> David Henningsson</a> <pre>(In reply to Mike C from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93946#c22">comment #22</a>) > > On the system one way to show the analog "availability" is doing: > $ aplay -L *sigh* I asked for alsa-info, not "aplay -L". > Whilst in principle I could work to "disable" the internal speaker port > using the tool you mentioned I don't think that this is something that the > typical non-power user would be expected to do. After all there are a lot of > tower computers that do not have any internal speakers in the box, even if > there is a sound output socket on the motherboard. All those tower computers do not have the phantom internal speaker that you're having, therefore your reasoning does not apply. The phantom internal speaker is not a common bug, and it's not a bug in PA, it's a bug in the lower layers of the audio stack. Tanu and Mike, I'm getting tired of arguing with you. Perhaps the most common routing bug/request I've got over the past few years is that when HDMI is unplugged, sound should be rerouted to internal speakers. Now that's implemented [1] - after many discussions and at least one rewrite just to make Tanu happy - and now you claim it's a regression and that it should be reverted. Every routing change breaks somebody's workflow, but it's an improvement for many, so don't revert it. [1] At least for machines where HDMI and analog share the same sound card.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>