<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Changing device profile to HDMI is reset to default after short delay" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93946#c24">Comment # 24</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Changing device profile to HDMI is reset to default after short delay" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93946">bug 93946</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tanuk@iki.fi" title="Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk@iki.fi>"> Tanu Kaskinen</a> <pre>(In reply to David Henningsson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93946#c23">comment #23</a>) > I disagree that this is a regression - the phantom internal speaker is a bug > caused by lower layers (ALSA/BIOS/hw). We should not revert the change when > it improves routing in several other scenarios; as we would then regress > those scenarios instead. You already agreed that it's a valid thing to expect HDMI continue working after display going to sleep. That use case worked before, now it doesn't work. Clearly a regression. It's true that reverting the patch in 9.0 will cause a regression for those users who liked the new feature in 8.0, but the thing is that the patch should never have been applied in the first place. > Also, I'm far from confident that what you're proposing won't cause > regressions in some other scenario. Then we'll fix those issues or revert my patch in 10.0.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>