[pulseaudio-discuss] arecord CPU consumption high with pulseaudio
jim at duda.tzo.com
Sun Mar 30 06:50:38 PDT 2008
Well, I do notice that parec doesn't have the same issue, so maybe the
issue is that arecord isn't all that good with pulse, hence, the need
I do retain the claim that later versions of pulse have higher cpu
consumption when using a combined_sink.
Jim Duda wrote:
> I've noticed that when I use arecord without pulse, raw alsa, the cpu
> consumption of arecord is very low, almost zero.
> However, when using arecord with pulseaudio, I find cpu consumption very
> With 0.9.6, I found that arecord ran in the high 90's, and using ^C to
> kill the process wasn't useful. I had to kill -9.
> With >= 0.9.9, I found that arecord ran around 75%, and using ^C would
> work consistently.
> I have a 2.8 Ghz P4 with hyperthreading.
> Is it expected that arecord usage be so high with pulseaudio?
> I also found another curious note. With 0.9.6, a combined_sink results
> in pulseaudion consuming ~ 10-20% cpu while playing a wav file. With >=
> 0.9.10, I have found that using a combined_sink now consumes 50%. I
> don't find this unreasonable giving what combined sink is doing, just
> thought I'd pass on my findings.
> load-module module-combine sink_name=misterhouse
> Just attempting to route audio out 2 different cards.
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss