[pulseaudio-discuss] is there any special reason libpulse and libpulsecommon are separate libraries?
lennart at poettering.net
Thu Jan 14 05:23:39 PST 2010
On Thu, 14.01.10 02:50, paul ヽ (ephraim_owns at hotmail.com) wrote:
> i ask because the circular dependancy they have on each other
> prevents libpulse being built with -no-undefined, which means that
> you could never compile pulse audio on windows afaik
Yes. libpulse is API stable while libpulsecommon is not.
For a longer explanation please read this:
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss