Hi,<br> <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com">pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">> 3) In the latency reported by module-loopback.c, the second number<br> > (i.e.<br> > the internal jitter buffer) dominates, both in USB => same USB and USB<br> > => onboard audio cases: 63.91+733.32+11.65 ms<br> ><br> > So, for me, it looks like the USB master clock (from which the USB<br> > audio<br> > clock is derived) is too unstable WRT the system timer as a reference,<br> > but this doesn't apply to the "internal audio vs system timer"<br> > situation.<br> <br> </div>Nah. It's more a configuration issue. I tried with pactl load-module<br> module-loopback latency_msec=20 and I get a really low latency. Can you play<br> with this latency_msec parameter and report the log?<br> Thanks,<br> <font color="#888888">-Pierre<br></font></blockquote><div><br> We have tried with the below command<br><br> $ pactl load-module module-loopback latency_msec=20<br><br> But still delay problem is there. (we have also tried with latency_msec=10,30,40,100)<br> you can find the attached log file<br><br> Regards<br> Abdul Moiz<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><font color="#888888"> </font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br> _______________________________________________<br> pulseaudio-discuss mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org">pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br>