Hi Luiz, Tanu,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:luiz.dentz@gmail.com" target="_blank">luiz.dentz@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Frederic,<br>
<div><br>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Dalleau, Frederic<br>
<<a href="mailto:frederic.dalleau@intel.com" target="_blank">frederic.dalleau@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> This is good question.<br>
><br>
> Current patch include a configuration, so either the user is fine with the<br>
> default sink or he do not use the feature at all :D<br>
><br>
> However, the following possibilities can be written :<br>
> 1) statically configure another sink in configuration file.<br>
> 2) Use the intended role : "music", or "voice"<br>
> 3) Other audio policy?<br>
><br>
> All these scenario can be resumed into a call to function that returns the<br>
> desired sink.<br>
><br>
> Number 1) is too restrictive.<br>
> We could imagine the loopback is an application, so number 2) make sense.<br>
> Number 3) would for sure require an external module to avoid<br>
> module-bluetooth-device depending on a policy module.<br>
<br>
</div>I got the impression that we are going forward with the idea of a<br>
policy module for PA, no idea if in the end it would load a policy or<br>
make a decision based on intent role, but anyways IMO the routing<br>
decisions should not be in module-bluetooth-discover.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>ok I'm updating the patches and will repost soon<br><br>Frédéric<br> </div></div>