Hello Peter, I have elaborated the points on the list. 3. Pass the resampling test cases in new environment. I have found the test cases in the present code tree in /src/tests/resampler.c where all combinations of sampling rate and sampling format are tested. After refactoring the code, the old test cases should pass. > 3. Changing the resampling algorithm dynamically based on the scenario. Fixing the sampling rate, for different sources different resampling algorithms can be used based on either CPU performance/Quality or both. <div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Peter Meerwald <<a href="mailto:pmeerw@pmeerw.net" target="_blank">pmeerw@pmeerw.net</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello Dinesh, <div> > I am very excited to work on Resampling projects and contribute to it. I > would like to list some of my ideas regarding that project. > 1. From the ideas page, i inferred that I have to refactor the present code > to use libavresample instead of current ffmpeg. > 2. I also found that, speex is obsolete and research whether new opus-tools > is better than speex in resampling . If so, refactor the code to use the > opus-tools. > 3. Pass the resampling test cases in new environment. > In addition to this, I would like to propose a new idea. > 3. Changing the resampling algorithm dynamically based on the scenario. </div>can you please elaborate on item (3) and (3) :) what are criteria of passing a resampling test case? what scenarios for using different resampling algorithms are there? regards, p. -- Peter Meerwald <a href="tel:%2B43-664-2444418" value="+436642444418" target="_blank">+43-664-2444418</a> (mobile) </blockquote></div>