CVS access policy, branching/tagging, code review, etc.

[Mike A. Harris]

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Keith Packard wrote:

>> Maybe in some organizations. The way this tree was originally set up it 
>> is intended that HEAD be the release vehicle.
>
>I'd really rather see "normal" development done on HEAD with releases done 
>on branches; the expectation is that the release branch will provide a 
>place for back-porting of security fixes with future minor releases.  How 
>is that done in the CURRENT-STABLE-HEAD world?

Indeed.


-- 
Mike A. Harris     ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat