RFC: What to do with the stale/buggy Xft/Xrender in the tree.
Mike A. Harris
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:23:12 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Keith Packard wrote:
>Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:20:53 -0800
>From: Keith Packard <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Cc: Keith Packard <email@example.com>
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1538145085P";
> micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
>List-Id: People working on X software releases
>Subject: Re: RFC: What to do with the stale/buggy Xft/Xrender in the tree.
>Ok, if we're going to update the Xft/Xrender libraries, I'd like to get an
>option included to *not* install them so that people using upstream
>versions don't accidentally lose big if they make/install X.
>The default value for whether to install them should probably be 'false'
>for most Linux distros which have already split out these libraries from
>their X bits.
Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat