[SCIM] skim and Fedora Core 2

[LiuCougar]

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:17:23 +0200, Jan Hefti <j.hefti at hamburg.de> wrote:
> Technically, I think either would be fine, but maybe people would ask
> about the public key, so to keep things consistent (either leave all
> rpms unsigned or have them signed with the same key), an unsigned rpm
> could be the better option.
Thanks. I fully agree with you ;)

Regards,

-- 
"People's characters are strengthened through struggle against
difficulties; they are weakened by comfort."
- Old Chinese adage