<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - No way to filter devices" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63807#c11">Comment # 11</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - No way to filter devices" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63807">bug 63807</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:zeenix@gmail.com" title="Zeeshan Ali <zeenix@gmail.com>"> Zeeshan Ali</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=63807#c10">comment #10</a>) > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=63807#c9">comment #9</a>) > > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=63807#c8">comment #8</a>) > > > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=63807#c6">comment #6</a>) > > > > However, I agree with you the API could be better documented (move the > > > > filter description to the API section & add links). > > > > > > I disagree. documentation has a reference to the part of the code that > > > already describes the rule and filter format. I'm closing the bug as WONTFIX. > > > > How is disagreeing with this lead to WONTFIX all of a sudden? Did you read > > my reply above at all? > > Yeah, I did. As commented in the patch Hans also disagrees with this > approach. Hans has always disagreed so that is not news. Pity you realized that after putting up a patch in the right direction and getting my hopes up. :( > That's the reason I've closed it as WONTFIX. Would have been nicer if Hans had updated this bug one year ago so I wouldn't have hoped spice team is capable of comping up with good APIs. BTW, even with the current-string based API the correct resolution is FIXED, not WONTFIX.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>