<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Also install qemu guest agent"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93022#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Also install qemu guest agent"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93022">bug 93022</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:bugzilla@victortoso.com" title="Victor Toso <bugzilla@victortoso.com>"> <span class="fn">Victor Toso</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Zeeshan Ali from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93022#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> So that users don't have to fetch two different binaries from two different
> sources? Most (if not all) users who'd want spice-vdagent on the guest,
> would very likely also want qemu agent installed.</span >
>From my point of view, spice-guest-tools are tools related to spice. For
instance, It make sense to include the webdav daemon for shared folders which
is an upstream feature.
Correct me if I'm mistaken but I don't see qemu-ga integrated with spice.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>