<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Also install qemu guest agent" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93022#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Also install qemu guest agent" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93022">bug 93022</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:zeenix@gmail.com" title="Zeeshan Ali <zeenix@gmail.com>"> Zeeshan Ali</a> <pre>(In reply to Victor Toso from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93022#c3">comment #3</a>) > (In reply to Zeeshan Ali from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93022#c2">comment #2</a>) > > So that users don't have to fetch two different binaries from two different > > sources? Most (if not all) users who'd want spice-vdagent on the guest, > > would very likely also want qemu agent installed. > > From my point of view, spice-guest-tools are tools related to spice. For > instance, It make sense to include the webdav daemon for shared folders > which is an upstream feature. If we are being very strict about names, yeah sure but I think we should strive to make user's lives easier even when that sometimes means not being very strict about names and definitions. Not sure if oVirt agent really belongs in this binary either but AFAIK it was recently included.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>