<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Also install qemu guest agent" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93022#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Also install qemu guest agent" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93022">bug 93022</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:zeenix@gmail.com" title="Zeeshan Ali <zeenix@gmail.com>"> Zeeshan Ali</a> <pre>(In reply to Zeeshan Ali from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93022#c4">comment #4</a>) > (In reply to Victor Toso from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93022#c3">comment #3</a>) > > (In reply to Zeeshan Ali from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93022#c2">comment #2</a>) > > > So that users don't have to fetch two different binaries from two different > > > sources? Most (if not all) users who'd want spice-vdagent on the guest, > > > would very likely also want qemu agent installed. > > > > From my point of view, spice-guest-tools are tools related to spice. For > > instance, It make sense to include the webdav daemon for shared folders > > which is an upstream feature. > > If we are being very strict about names, yeah sure but I think we should > strive to make user's lives easier even when that sometimes means not being > very strict about names and definitions. > > Not sure if oVirt agent really belongs in this binary either but AFAIK it > was recently included. Also, not all virtio drivers installed by this binary are related to spice either, are they?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>