[Spice-devel] repository reorg
marcandre.lureau at gmail.com
Wed Jun 22 09:19:23 PDT 2011
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:00:10PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
>> Suggested changes:
>> spice - merge spice-protocol into it
>> spice-protocol - kill it
>> common - extract to a separate library, it's own configure, pkg-config, name it spice-render,
>> and have spice-gtk and spice (server and old client) rely on it.
> I assume this "libspice" will contain spice/common + spice-protocol? Or do
> you envision the protocol bits to go elsewhere?
I could still be packaged in spice-protocol-devel,
spice-controller-devel, spice-vdagent-devel etc..
> I like this idea more than merging keeping the current moduleset and
> merging spice-gtk in spice, but I was under the impression that turning
> common/ into a library was difficult, which is why we chose to merge
> spice-gtk in spice instead. If it's not that hard, I'mm all for it!
Hard, hopefully not so much. It should be a *lot* of perl -p -i -e
More information about the Spice-devel