[Spice-devel] Fwd: OSX spice-gtk and pyparsing

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Wed May 4 01:41:02 PDT 2011


On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:32:12PM -0500, Cliff Sharp wrote:
> So, now I use the X11 environment that comes with osx when I actually run
> spiced and/or spicy. But I feel you are correct in saying that it is
> better to use the X11 system that comes with osx.
> 
> I was just attempting to notify others of these issues in hopes that it
> might help them to save some time.

Ah ok, thanks for that, I thought you wanted to fix things on the macports
X side :) Since spice-gtk-x11 on osx isn't that interesting to me (I'd
rather have a more native port using gtk-osx), if it works with Apple X11,
I'd leave it at that :)

> Do you feel it is worth the time to build an Xcode project for building
> spicec and spice-gtk to distribute?  The visual debugger is sure nice in
> Xcode.

I wouldn't spend too much time on an Xcode project for spicec. It might be
useful for spice-gtk, but it might be too early for that. In my opinion,
what would be really nice is
* a working spice-gtk using gtk-osx (spice-gtk currently has X11/windows
  specific bits that needs to be ported)
* when we have that, having some kind of bundle that people can install to
  use in xcode would be great (I think the gtk-osx project has some tools
  to help in doing that)
* longer term, a cocoa spice client (probably using spice-client-glib for
  the low-level spice stuff) would be even better (I assume this would ease
  iOS porting)

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20110504/3f5749c9/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list