cfergeau at redhat.com
Tue Mar 13 06:02:33 PDT 2012
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:58:26AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> > glog is missing the "modified" method name, which is added by the
> > patch.
> > QA guys rely especially on the method name.
> That's the problem: we can't refactor, rename function, add arguments or
> change order of things, or even perhaps add more debugging. This smells
> wrong. We can't guarantee the debugging messages won't break... We need
> something else imho, perhaps like tracing point etc?
I think they are exploring using systemtap too. In the mean time, it
doesn't really hurt to have more expressive logs messages, and logs in
places where it might be useful...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Spice-devel