<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)"> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="PlaceType"/> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="PlaceName"/> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="place"/>  <style>  </style> </head> <body lang=DE link=blue vlink=purple> <div class=Section1> I got it compiled and running now!<o:p></o:p> I had to insert a lot of casts and do some tricking with the libasound library (had to use the 32 bit one) and finally it compiled and even started.<o:p></o:p> But the results are quite disappointing with a Windows XP virtual machine.<o:p></o:p> In my virtual machine the “Red Hat QXL GPU” driver is installed as well the “<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Red</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Hat</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Virtual</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Desktop</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Interface</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType w:st="on">Port</st1:PlaceType></st1:place>” driver.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop the results are disappointing and even if I run QEMU without the qxl and spice option the results are better.<o:p></o:p> Has anybody an idea what I am doing wrong, how can I find out what may be the reason?<o:p></o:p> Another point: the spice client seems to be very unstable in specific situations.<o:p></o:p> When I opened MS Powerpoint and went to a specific slide with a lot of graphics it regularly crashed without leaving any message. There was no difference whether I used the self-compiled Linux client or the downloaded Windows binaries. <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Especially the speed behavior is important for me to decide if using SPICE is the right way to go and then to possibly contribute where necessary.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thanks for any help.<o:p></o:p> Stefan<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Alexander Larsson [mailto:alexl@redhat.com] Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 15:43 An: Stefan Zintgraf Cc: dlaor@redhat.com; spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Betreff: Re: AW: [Spice-devel] SPICE questions <o:p> </o:p> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 15:34 +0100, Stefan Zintgraf wrote:<o:p></o:p> > Thanks for the answer.<o:p></o:p> > <o:p></o:p> > <o:p></o:p> > <o:p></o:p> > The faq says: I built Spice server on a 32-bit machine and it failed.<o:p></o:p> > What can I do?<o:p></o:p> > <o:p></o:p> > I've read the FAQ but was not aware if it is impossible by design to<o:p></o:p> > get everything running on a single 32 Bit Linux.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I don't really know the exact requirements, just read this in the faq.<o:p></o:p> Its possible that this is fixable, but currently it does not build on<o:p></o:p> 32bit.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> </div> </body> </html>