<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Christophe Fergeau <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cfergeau@redhat.com" target="_blank">cfergeau@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:<br>
> Quoting GNU maintainer manual:<br>
> <a href="https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html" target="_blank">https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html</a><br>
><br>
> "Alternatively, the ‘(C)’ or C-in-a-circle can be omitted entirely; the<br>
> word ‘Copyright’ suffices."<br>
<br>
</span>The rule which asks for that to be done is:<br>
sc_copyright_format:<br>
        @require='Copyright .*Red 'Hat', Inc\.'                         \<br>
        containing='Copyright .*Red 'Hat                                \<br>
        halt='Red Hat copyright is missing Inc.'                        \<br>
          $(_sc_search_regexp)<br>
        @prohibit='Copyright [^(].*Red 'Hat                             \<br>
        halt='consistently use (C) in Red Hat copyright'                \<br>
          $(_sc_search_regexp)<br>
        @prohibit='\<Red''Hat\>'                                        \<br>
        halt='spell Red Hat as two words'                               \<br>
          $(_sc_search_regexp)<br>
<br>
I don't know if Red Hat legal department insists on the (C) being present.<br>
I can reword the commit log to explicit it's only being enforced for Red Hat's<br>
copyright, or I can drop the patch.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br>It might be specified by Red Hat legal somewhere, but then I wonder why there wouldn't be checks for that (in RH builds checks), so it's probably unneeded.<br></div></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Marc-André Lureau</div>
</div></div>