<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/30/2015 10:03 PM, Barak Azulay
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:-3339791443746581230@unknownmsgid" type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div>
        <div style="direction:rtl"><br>
        </div>
        <br>
        Barak</div>
      <div>
        <div style="direction:rtl"><br>
        </div>
        On Sep 30, 2015, at 10:04, Michal Skrivanek <<a
          moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="mailto:michal.skrivanek@redhat.com"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:michal.skrivanek@redhat.com">michal.skrivanek@redhat.com</a></a>>
        wrote:<br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div><span></span><br>
          <span>On Sep 25, 2015, at 19:40 , David Mansfield <<a
              moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:ovirt@dm.cobite.com"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ovirt@dm.cobite.com">ovirt@dm.cobite.com</a></a>>
            wrote:</span><br>
          <span></span><br>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>[cross-posted to <a
                moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:devel@ovirt.org"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:devel@ovirt.org">devel@ovirt.org</a></a>
              and <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org">spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org</a>]</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Hi oVirt Devs,</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>I'm here from the spice-devel
              list where we were discussing some changes to the behavior
              of the spice guest agent reacting to a user disconnect (of
              the spice console).</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <span></span><br>
          <span>Hi David,</span><br>
          <span>great, any enhancement is good! Vinzenz, please add more
            details to my guesses below:)</span><br>
          <span></span><br>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Some information about how the
              ovirt-guest-agent works would be informative if you can
              spare a minute.</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>The functionality being
              discussed is locking the user session in the VM when the
              user disconnects from spice (either intentionally or
              unintentionally).</span><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div style="direction:rtl"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="direction:ltr">What OSs are we talking about (the
        behavior is significantly different and each pose different
        challenges.</div>
      <div style="direction:rtl"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="direction:rtl"><br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Also, peripherally, how does
              oVirt ensure secure access by authorized users of a VM and
              prevent "over-the-shoulder" snooping (spice graphics
              session stealing) or other forms of information leak from
              a VM shared by multiple users.</span><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>We have several mechanisms to ensure that:</div>
      <div>1 - ticketing system managed by the engine, so permissions
        are checked on the ovirt-engine, if a user has permissions to
        connect to the vm than the engines sends vdsm the ticket (and it
        sets the ticket to the spice server ... Through libvirt), and
        than the client receives this ticket to present to the spice
        server on connect (of course this ticket has time expiration)</div>
      <div>2 - every time the client disconnects we receive an event and
        immediately send lock desktop command to the guest (through the
        ovirt-guest-agent). This is implemented both for win and Linux
        but for a Linux guest for that to work one must work on run
        level 5.</div>
      <div>3 - anyway since this is racy , in order to avoid session
        theft we do not allow a second user to connect to a vm when the
        first user disconnected, the second user will be able to login
        only after the cm was rebooted.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>So here are some questions:</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Can a VM be "shared" by multiple
              users in oVirt at all? Are there known security issues
              that would make this a non-recommended or fundamentally
              un-securable setup?</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <span></span><br>
          <span>normally no, there is a semi-supported hook to allow
            that with VNC (and even that is slightly broken IIRC at the
            moment), but in general we do want so support that for
            specific usecases</span><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>The question is not clear enough,</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>In case you mean simultaneously (2 users) than the above
        answer is relevant.</div>
      <div>In case you mean sequential ... Than the answer is explained
        above , and yes we allow a vm to be shared among several users
        or groups.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div><span></span><br>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Does the oVirt agent lock the
              session on disconnect? Always / unconditionally?</span></blockquote>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>IIRC It will always try to lock, but we can not guarantee
        that the operation actually succeeded (long story ...)</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span> If it's configurable, where
              does the configuration reside - in the vm guest, on the vm
              host (/engine) or on the client?</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <span></span><br>
          <span>it's oVirt management UI configuration, it changes the
            host's behavior on spice disconnect per VM</span><br>
          <span></span><br>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Does the oVirt agent lock all
              sessions or the current active session?</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <span></span><br>
          <span>just the active AFAIK</span><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>On windows its implemented only for desktop OSs (... Xp
        ...win7 ...) we lock only the interactive session, for win
        server this is not supported , in fact we do not install the SSO
        mechanism at all because it works differently for those OSs
        (w2k3 , 2008, 2010)</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>On Linux it's a bit more complicated , but we find the
        session of the user we know connected to the vm ... And send the
        lock command.</div>
    </blockquote>
    Actually not completely correct, currently we only lock the first,
    we don't try to match the user, the current assumption is that we
    only allow one user per VM therefore there can't be more than one
    active session.<br>
    That said, that's how it is currently implemented. Not that this is
    the best way.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:-3339791443746581230@unknownmsgid" type="cite">
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>As explained above since there is no guarantee for that to
        succeed than we do not allow other users to connect till the cm
        is rebooted.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div><span></span><br>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>How does it lock the sessions? 
              I've looked at the code and it appears '/usr/bin/loginctl
              lock-sessions' is being used on machines it's provided on
              and something more complicated on older boxes.  Does the
              user have a way to customize this behavior? and if so, is
              it VM guest, VM host or client configuration?</span></blockquote>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>AFAIR this is not configurable ... But Vinzenz should be able
        to give an accurate answer</div>
    </blockquote>
    The only configuration you can do as of ovirt/RHEV 3.6 is that you
    are now able to say to perform one of the following actions on
    console disconnect:<br>
    - Lock the screen<br>
    - Logout the current user<br>
    - Reboot the VM<br>
    - Shutdown the VM<br>
    - Do nothing<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:-3339791443746581230@unknownmsgid" type="cite">
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <blockquote type="cite"><br>
          </blockquote>
          <span></span><br>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Does the agent lock linux
              consoles (VC1, VC2) "sessions" (e.g. with vlock?)</span><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>AFAIU no, Vinzenz ?</div>
    </blockquote>
    No, currently we don't however I guess we should consider that in
    case of 'Lock screen'<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:-3339791443746581230@unknownmsgid" type="cite">
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>As I understand it, console
              access in ovirt is managed by setting a temporary graphics
              password and then generating an .ini file which is
              launched by remote-viewer. This password expires after a
              short period of time.  So is there a mechanism where
              access is denied if a user is already connected or is this
              allowed?</span></blockquote>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>The  mechanism is explained above , it's the ticketing system
        (or temporary password as you referee to it above) t. The second
        user will not get a ticket from the ovirt-engine</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <blockquote type="cite"><br>
          </blockquote>
          <span></span><br>
          <span>connection is not allowed unless "strict user checking"
            disabled in UI</span><br>
          <span>if it is disable or you use the same pwd then the
            previous session is terminated and replaced (unless using
            that hook I mentioned).</span><br>
          <span>But we try to treat the .vv file as a one time thing,
            there's delete_this_file=1 which instructs virt-viewer to
            remove the file upon startup, so even when browser place
            them on a shared drive they shouldn't be there for too long</span><br>
          <span></span><br>
          <span></span><br>
          <span>What kind of changes do you have in mind on the SPICE
            side?</span><br>
          <span>It would certainly make it easier for us as currently we
            kind of guess when to lock�we receive multiple
            disconnecst(per channel) and don't really know what's going
            on�having a direct support for this inside the spice
            server would be better. But it needs to allow the
            flexibility of different actions except desktop lock (we
            have "nothing", "shutdown", "logoff" I think). Perhaps a way
            how to signal relevant information to vdsm is enough</span><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    This is why I have reported this issue:
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91085">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91085</a><br>
    Having session based events would make it easier to avoid starting
    the handling on migrations, where in some conditions there's a race
    which can cause the screen lock mechanism to kick in just in the
    moment the transfer of the VM goes over to the destination
    hypervisor.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:-3339791443746581230@unknownmsgid" type="cite">
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div><span></span><br>
          <span>Thanks,</span><br>
          <span>michal</span><br>
          <span></span><br>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Enough questions for now, sorry
              for the battering.</span><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Feel free to ask ;-)</div>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>-- </span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Thanks,</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>David Mansfield</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Cobite, INC.</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span>Devel mailing list</span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:Devel@ovirt.org">Devel@ovirt.org</a></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <blockquote type="cite"><span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a></span><br>
          </blockquote>
          <span></span><br>
          <span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
          <span>Devel mailing list</span><br>
          <span><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Devel@ovirt.org">Devel@ovirt.org</a></span><br>
          <span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a></span><br>
          <span></span><br>
          <span></span><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Regards,

Vinzenz Feenstra | Senior Software Engineer
RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D
Phone: +420 532 294 625
IRC: vfeenstr or evilissimo

Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com</pre>
  </body>
</html>