Hi, I tested swfdec on the beagle board (<a href="http://www.beagleboard.org">www.beagleboard.org</a>) which is based on a TI OMAP 3530 ARM Cortex A8 processor. The OS that I used was Angstrom Linux (<a href="http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/">www.angstrom-distribution.org/</a>) and the swfdec version is 0.9.2 (I believe it uses a gtk back-end and that it is an unstable release). So far, it seems that I cannot run swfdec without X. That is, there is no version of swfdec that doesn't depend on X. I'm I right? I would like to hopefully avoid the overhead of X when I run the swfdec player on the board. My second question is, if you look at this file: <a href="http://www.vibratogrilljazz.com/flash/main.swf">http://www.vibratogrilljazz.com/flash/main.swf</a> It plays correctly on my laptop which runs Fedora 11. However, on the ARM board, it when I click on the "Menu" button, nothing happens. What could be different on the x86 laptop that makes it play well on the laptop and not on the ARM based board? I'd like to correct this issue since its relevant to me. Also, which version is recommended for production? The 0.9.2 release or the 0.8.4 one? IMHO Swfdec could be better than Flash Lite in some ways because I could run some Flash apps which I couldn't run using the Flash Lite 3.0 player. Security issues are not a major concern at the moment, the main thing I need is a flash player that plays the swfs correctly. Finally, I'd like to look around and see what I could do to help out with development. First, I'd like to have a good enough understanding of how things have been implemented and issues that need to be solved to make swfdec as good as Adobe Flash Player 10. Any pointers will be highly appreciated. I'm also interested in knowing why it has taken so long for Flash Player 10 to be ported to the ARM Architecture? Is it technical complexity? And if that's the case, what makes it complex? Kind Regards, Andreas