<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - systemd-analyze: rewrite in C" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60112#c11">Comment # 11</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - systemd-analyze: rewrite in C" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60112">bug 60112</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:kay@vrfy.org" title="Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>"> Kay Sievers</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=60112#c10">comment #10</a>) > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=74291" name="attach_74291" title="systemd-analyze: rewrite in C. Merged approach.">attachment 74291</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=74291&action=edit" title="systemd-analyze: rewrite in C. Merged approach.">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=60112&attachment=74291'>[review]</a> [review] > systemd-analyze: rewrite in C. Merged approach. > > This patch sits on top of Marc-Antoine's first three patches. > > It combines my previous version with some ideas from Marc-Antoine's version. > > I did not yet merge systemctl dot because i have 2 questions about it: > - how do we do this without breaking the interface stability promise? It's a "debug tool". I see no problem really to move it. It never really belonged into systemctl from today's view. > just exec systemd-analyze from systemctl and change the docs to refer to > systemd-analyze? Change the docs to reflect the new location only. > - "dot" is somehow ambiguous since it just refers to the output format. > so while we are changing the interface, maybe we could come up with > something more descriptive. > "dependency-graph" or just "dep-graph"? > other ideas? Sounds fine. It will also allow us to add an output format option if some fancy new format is better than dot.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>