<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:peeters.simon@gmail.com" title="Simon Peeters <peeters.simon@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Simon Peeters</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - systemd-analyze: rewrite in C"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60112">bug 60112</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Attachment #73983 is obsolete</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>1
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - systemd-analyze: rewrite in C"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60112#c10">Comment # 10</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - systemd-analyze: rewrite in C"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60112">bug 60112</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:peeters.simon@gmail.com" title="Simon Peeters <peeters.simon@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Simon Peeters</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=74291" name="attach_74291" title="systemd-analyze: rewrite in C. Merged approach.">attachment 74291</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=74291&action=edit" title="systemd-analyze: rewrite in C. Merged approach.">[details]</a></span> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=60112&attachment=74291'>[review]</a>
systemd-analyze: rewrite in C. Merged approach.
This patch sits on top of Marc-Antoine's first three patches.
It combines my previous version with some ideas from Marc-Antoine's version.
I did not yet merge systemctl dot because i have 2 questions about it:
- how do we do this without breaking the interface stability promise?
just exec systemd-analyze from systemctl and change the docs to refer to
systemd-analyze?
- "dot" is somehow ambiguous since it just refers to the output format.
so while we are changing the interface, maybe we could come up with
something more descriptive.
"dependency-graph" or just "dep-graph"?
other ideas?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>