<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - logind sessions don't follow nested audit sessions"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65409#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - logind sessions don't follow nested audit sessions"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65409">bug 65409</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:marius.vollmer@redhat.com" title="Marius Vollmer <marius.vollmer@redhat.com>"> <span class="fn">Marius Vollmer</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=65409#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> In newer fedora the session ID is actually sealed off, so this wouldn't work
> anymore.</span >
Hmm, what is "this" here? Running sshd from within an already existing
session? What would fail? pam_loginuid?
<span class="quote">> Also, the way we see it we initialize from the audit ID when we can, but we
> wouldn't always gurantee its equal.</span >
I'd say that as long as a process has /proc/self/sessionid at all, the logind
session if should be guaranteed to follow it. As far as I can see, this should
always be possible, by creating a new session if necessary. If you don't want
nested sessions, that probably needs to be blocked in pam_loginuid, no?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>