<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - commit 7708588119 broke logind DBus API" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67131#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - commit 7708588119 broke logind DBus API" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67131">bug 67131</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:michael+freedesktop@stapelberg.de" title="Michael Stapelberg <michael+freedesktop@stapelberg.de>"> Michael Stapelberg</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=67131#c3">comment #3</a>) > 203 is probably cutoff. 203? Should that say 205, or is it really 203? > Basically, the old versions didn't serialize the cgroup path during reexec, > and we changed the layout of the cgroup tree quite a bit. The new code will > hence try to use different paths than what the old version set up. And > confusion will ensue. "systemctl status" will show you incorrect process > lists, "systemctl stop" doesn't work anymore, systemd itself might consider > services stopped that actually are running and suchlike. > > We nowdays do serialize the cgroup path, so this won't happen again. So I gather from that: for updates from 205 to future versions, reboots will not be required due to cgroup path serialization.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>