<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:zbyszek@in.waw.pl" title="Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>"> <span class="fn">Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO --- - Autocompletion work for some template units, but not for others"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66912">bug 66912</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Summary</td>
<td>Autocompletion should take both installed unit files and loaded units into account, not just the latter
</td>
<td>Autocompletion work for some template units, but not for others
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO --- - Autocompletion work for some template units, but not for others"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66912#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO --- - Autocompletion work for some template units, but not for others"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66912">bug 66912</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:zbyszek@in.waw.pl" title="Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>"> <span class="fn">Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Hi, sorry for the delay.
Looking at your report again, I think that my initial guess that this is
something about loaded vs. unloaded units is wrong.
In general, 'systemctl status <something>@.service' doesn't work:
systemctl status user@.service
Failed to issue method call: Unit name user@.service is not valid.
and for me 'systemctl status user<TAB>' doesn't propose user@.service as a
possible completion, which is OK, because if it won't work, it shouldn't be
proposed as a completion.
I don't have netcfg@.service and dhcpd@.service, so I have no idea why they
behave differently. Recently (post systemd-206) there have been a bunch of
fixes wrt. completions. Could you retest with systemd-207 when it is released
(this week), if you have any units for which systemctl status actually runs,
but are not proposed as completions?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>