<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - fstab-generator fails to create mount unit" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73710#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - fstab-generator fails to create mount unit" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73710">bug 73710</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mario.natiello@gmail.com" title="Mario Natiello <mario.natiello@gmail.com>"> Mario Natiello</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=73710#c8">comment #8</a>) > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=73710#c7">comment #7</a>) > > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=73710#c6">comment #6</a>) > > > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=73710#c4">comment #4</a>) > > > > Supporting many mounts on the same mountpoint has been on the TODO list for > > > > a while. This case should then be supported too. > > > Hmm, it is in the TODO list? > > I understood it this way, but if you say that's not it, then too bad. > > I mean, I am always open for ideas, I just don't see how we could do this > without losing the nice property that mount point paths and their unit names > are easily translatable forth and back... Do you have an idea how this could > work? One way would be to have both the source and the target in the unit name. (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=73710#c5">comment #5</a>) OK, I see your point, but yes, I am a little disappointed. I can live with it, anyway :) If no modification is expected from systemd, perhaps a warning in the man page of fstab should say that valid fstab syntax may be invalid for systemd-fstab-generator.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>