<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:nico.nelson-91c8b80@yopmail.com" title="Nico Nelson <nico.nelson-91c8b80@yopmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Nico Nelson</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - udev fails to build with uclibc"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73729">bug 73729</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
<td>REOPENED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>NOTOURBUG
</td>
<td>---
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - udev fails to build with uclibc"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73729#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - udev fails to build with uclibc"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73729">bug 73729</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:nico.nelson-91c8b80@yopmail.com" title="Nico Nelson <nico.nelson-91c8b80@yopmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Nico Nelson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Kay Sievers: as you use almost any(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=73729#c7">comment #7</a>)
<span class="quote">> We are certainly not rvereting the %m work. </span >
using the term "work" for that seems to a bit bold.
<span class="quote">> We make use of glibc and gcc
> extensions where they make sense. </span >
it certainly didn't make sense here. the existing code did exactly the same
thing, but in a manner guarantueed to work by both C and POSIX standards.
<span class="quote">> We are certainly not making our code more
> complex just to cover these exotic libcs.</span >
exotic ? just that red hat linux i.e. fedora doesn't use uclibc, doesn't make
it exotic.
<span class="quote">> The onus is on those libcs to
> rpvoide enough compatibility with glibc.</span >
you're basically demanding that any libc that is not libc be turned into glibc
including any runtime extensions such as %m, even if those break conformance.
<span class="quote">>
> Regarding building udev-only builds see
>
> <a href="http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/MinimalBuilds/">http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/MinimalBuilds/</a>
>
> And with your conspiracy theories and insults please go somewhere else, you
> will certainly not get us interested in your issues that way.</span >
i'm not aware of any insults. in case you took the "stupid idea" personally
(which was not my intention), i hereby apologize and rephrase it to "bad idea".</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>