<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - RFE: make /run/user/$UID tmpfs of its own"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75566#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - RFE: make /run/user/$UID tmpfs of its own"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75566">bug 75566</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:lennart@poettering.net" title="Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>"> <span class="fn">Lennart Poettering</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=75566#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=75566#c1">comment #1</a>)
> > c) adding size= to /sys/fs/cgroup doesn't hurt, but doesn't bring benefit
> > either
> Agreed. I’d argue we should still do it, just to make the mount list more
> assuring to users such as the original reporter of this bug :).</span >
Well, it's still snake oil. And suggests there was something to make more
secure while there isn't really. I'd always go for simplicity instead of trying
to fix assumed security holes that don't actually exist...</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>