<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - systemd segfaults if no cgroups are available" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74589#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - systemd segfaults if no cgroups are available" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74589">bug 74589</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:anonymous@dodgeit.com" title="Anonymous Helper <anonymous@dodgeit.com>"> Anonymous Helper</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=74589#c7">comment #7</a>) > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=74589#c6">comment #6</a>) > > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=74589#c2">comment #2</a>) > > > To make this work we'd need a patch, as nobody of us tests this. > > > > Yes, it's clear you don't test for NULL pointers before deferencing. Nobody > > else should need to provide a patch to fix the bug you created. If you can't > > figure out how to check for NULL pointers, STOP WRITING CODE IMMEDIATELY! > > You should never EVER be deferencing any pointer without first sanity > > checking its value. NO EXCEPTIONS! > > > > P.S. Please go die in a fire. > > Please stay civil. Such a tone is not acceptable. Dereferencing NULL pointers is not acceptable. Demanding someone else to provide a patch to correct such bad behavior is also not acceptable.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>