<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - Do not parse "debug" command line parameter" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76935#c35">Comment # 35</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - Do not parse "debug" command line parameter" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76935">bug 76935</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:katia.deluca176147@blacksails.tk" title="Alexandre Scheifer <katia.deluca176147@blacksails.tk>"> Alexandre Scheifer</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76935#c31">comment #31</a>) > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76935#c24">comment #24</a>) > > Systemd needs to be forked NOW. > > > > Linus explained it well already: > > > > Kay and Lennart: please just go away, disappear from the FOSS community, we > > don't need you and your crap. > > Please cite that quote as I've not seen it on LKML and didn't find it with a > quick search, so I'm interested in where else this topic is being discussed. Linus Torvalds wrote: +Paul Morgan I think what you (and others) seem to miss is that the systemd people made the "debug" option that we introduced not just do something - but do something useless that actively broke other peoples use of that option. It doesn't matter who "owns" it, the fact is, they broke it. Ok, fine. Bugs happen, and that's not what makes people upset. What makes me (and others) upset is that when the bug is reported, with explanations and a suggestion for how to fix it, Kay just closed the bug-report, claiming it wasn't a bug. Seriously? You want to debug kernel stuff, using the kernel command line command "debug" that makes the kernel more verbose, and now the systemd people say "sorry, we stole your thing and made it useless, and it's not a bug because you didn't call shot-gun". Now, if this was an isolated incident, I personally would let it go. There are bad engineers out there, it's not worth worrying about. Ignore them and move on. But this is not an isolated incident. This is how Kay has treated other bugs in the past. Literally months of stalling, closing bug-reports, and blaming other people and projects for problems that he caused, telling others how they should change their projects because he broke something, and obviously it can't be his fault. And that is a problem. <a href="https://plus.google.com/+TheodoreTso/posts/K7ijdmxJ8PF">https://plus.google.com/+TheodoreTso/posts/K7ijdmxJ8PF</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>