<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - systemd-detect-virt and directive ConditionVirtualization wrongly return vm for xen dom0" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77271#c11">Comment # 11</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - systemd-detect-virt and directive ConditionVirtualization wrongly return vm for xen dom0" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77271">bug 77271</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:andy.melnikov@gmail.com" title="Andy Melnikov <andy.melnikov@gmail.com>"> Andy Melnikov</a> <pre>I agree that if we are not sure we shouldn't output "xen-dom0". My hypothesis was that /proc/xen/capabilities always exists in dom0. If the hypothesis holds then we do know that it's "xen-domU" and there's no need for separate "xen". If there's a chance for /proc/xen/capabilities not to exist in dom0 then we can leave your patch as is.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>