<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - systemd pid 1 breaks after receiving sigquit" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87603#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - systemd pid 1 breaks after receiving sigquit" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87603">bug 87603</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:grossws@gmail.com" title="gross <grossws@gmail.com>"> gross</a> <pre>As I see in <a href="http://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/viewvc/sysvinit/trunk/src/init.c?annotate=159&root=sysvinit">http://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/viewvc/sysvinit/trunk/src/init.c?annotate=159&root=sysvinit</a> (around line 1146) sysvinit set SIG_IGN for SIGQUIT. It seems that OpenRC isn't an init (it provides rc but not /sbin/init), so it's behavior depends on underlying sysvinit/bsd-init. I don't see any SIGQUIT handler in upstart (and libnih), so it should behave like systemd, with pid 1 core dumped and broken system after `kill -SIGQUIT 1`. It's not a security problem, of course. It's at most an usability problem. Is default core dump required for debugging systemd? Is there any reason not to ignore it?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>